Portal Modelarji.com

brejker napisal/-a: Na spodnji strani imam krmilo že odrezano pod kotom, ki omogoča pomik krmila navzdol.

brejker napisal/-a:Se mogoče komu valja M6 nylon vijak (dolžine vsaj 50mm).
Potrebujem ga za privijačit krilo, Twista.

Lenko napisal/-a:Je mogoče kdo kje zasledil kaj napisanega o aeroprofilih v transsoničnem območju?
Bi bil zelo hvaležen...

Transonic Airfoil Design

The transonic airfoil design problem arises because we wish to limit shock drag losses at a given transonic speed. This effectively limits the minimum pressure coefficient that can be tolerated. Since both lift and thickness reduce (increase in magnitude) the minimum Cp, the transonic design problem is to create an airfoil section with high lift and/or thickness without causing strong shock waves. One can generally tolerate some supersonic flow without drag increase, so that most sections can operate efficiently as "supercritical airfoils". A rule of thumb is that the maximum local Mach numbers should not exceed about 1.2 to 1.3 on a well-designed supercritical airfoil. This produces a considerable increase in available Cl compared with entirely subcritical designs.

Supercritical sections usually refer to a special type of airfoil that is designed to operate efficiently with substantial regions of supersonic flow. Such sections often take advantage of many of the following design ideas to maximize lift or thickness at a given Mach number:

* Carry as much lift as is practical on the aft potion of the section where the flow is subsonic. The aft lower surface is an obvious candidate for increased loading (more positive Cp), although several considerations discussed below limit the extent to which this approach can be used.
* Make sure that sufficient lift is carried on the forward portion of the upper surface. As the Mach number increases, the pressure peak near the nose is diminished and without additional blunting of the nose, possible extra lift will be lost in this region.
* The lower surface near the nose can also be loaded by reducing the lower surface thickness near the leading edge. This provides both lift and positive pitching moment.
* Shocks on the upper surface near the leading edge produce much less wave drag than shocks aft of the airfoil crest and it is feasible, although not always best, to design sections with forward shocks. Such sections are known as "peaky" airfoils and were used on many transport aircraft.
* The idea of carefully tailoring the section to obtain locally supersonic flow without shockwaves (shock-free sections) has been pursued for many years, and such sections have been designed and tested. For most practical cases with a range of design CL and Mach number, sections with weak shocks are favored.


One must be cautious with supercritical airfoil design. Several of these sections have looked promising initially, but led to problems when actually incorporated into an aircraft design. Typical difficulties include the following.

* Too much aft loading can produce large negative pitching moments with trim drag and structural weight penalties.
* The adverse pressure gradient on the aft lower surface can produce separation in extreme cases.
* The thin trailing edge may be difficult to manufacture.
* Supercritical, and especially shock-free designs often are very sensitive to Mach and CL and may perform poorly at off-design conditions. The appearance of "drag creep" is quite common, a situation in which substantial section drag increase with Mach number occurs even at speeds below the design value.


The section with pressures shown below is typical of a modern supercritical section with a weak shock at its design condition. Note the rooftop Cp design with the minimum Cp considerably greater above Cp*.

Lenko napisal/-a:Najlepša hvala za tole rešil si mi rit

brejker napisal/-a:Naj za novo pobočno letalo kupim NiMh sprejemiški paket ali naj uporabim LiPote + BEC modul?